Case · M3 × Stay (utility service)
Opower: your energy use vs your neighbors'
Opower mailed home energy reports comparing each household's use with similar neighbors, with praise for efficient homes and tips. Across 588,446 households and twelve utilities, usage fell about 2.0% on average, and savings persisted after reports stopped (J-PAL summary of Allcott 2011 and Allcott & Rogers 2014).
The outcome · 2014
Average energy reduction of about 2.0% (1.4-3.3% across 12 utilities) in a randomized evaluation of 588,446 households; homes dropped after about two years still saved about 2% (Allcott & Rogers, American Economic Review, Oct 2014; via J-PAL). Oracle bought Opower in 2016 (~$532M).
Stage cell: M3 × Stay (utility service).
What they did. Home energy reports comparing a household's use with similar neighbors, plus approval for efficient households and practical tips, sent monthly or quarterly.
The mechanism. Chou cites Opower as a conformity anchor GT#58 (Actionable Gamification Ch.9, p.224) inspired by Cialdini: feedback on how close you are to the norm. It is social proof from similar others INF-T-SP-17 (Influence Ch.4, p.107). Praise for above-norm homes guards against the boomerang effect.
The outcome. -2.0% energy use (2014) Case grade A. From a regulator, a public filing or a peer-reviewed study. on average (1.4-3.3% by utility); monthly reports beat quarterly ones by about half a point, and savings persisted when reports stopped.
What it means at your stage. Comparison with true, close peers is one of the best-evidenced engagement levers, and it fits B2B too (usage vs similar teams). Pair the comparison with recognition for people already above the norm.
Caveats. Effects vary by site; later work found early sites were more responsive than later ones. Mechanism link Evidence grade A. Robust evidence: replicated, peer-reviewed research..
Would you have called it?
This case is also a round of Predict the Outcome: read the situation, pick what you think happened, then see the evidence.
Play this roundTry this
The techniques behind it
Each one is a starting point, not a recipe. Gamify It turns a technique into an experiment card for your product: the change, the metric, the guardrail and how long the test needs at your traffic.
- TechniqueEvidence grade B. Moderate evidence: solid studies with some limits.
Conformity Anchors (GT#58)
true peer benchmarks
Feedback that shows users how they compare with a relevant norm, such as how many campaigns similar teams send compared with theirs. Chou's lesson from home-energy reports: users already above the norm can slide back toward it unless they are recognized for beating it.
- TechniqueEvidence grade B. Moderate evidence: solid studies with some limits.
Proof from similar others
people like you
Choose testimonials, case studies and usage data by the visitor's industry, role, size, country, language or experience level, and let users filter reviews by "people like me". People follow those who resemble them far more than generic crowds.
- TechniqueEvidence grade B. Moderate evidence: solid studies with some limits.
Positive norms, never 'many people do the bad thing'
positive peer-norm copy
Write messages that show the desired behavior as common among people like the user, and never advertise how common the unwanted behavior is. Chou's warning case: a park sign saying many visitors take wood raised theft compared with no sign at all.
Limits
What we don’t claim
- Octalysis is a practitioner framework built from observing games, not a validated scientific model.Actionable Gamification Ch.15, pp.399-400
- No success is attributed to a single technique: real outcomes have many causes.
- Company names are used editorially; no endorsement is implied.
Sources
Actionable Gamification · Yu-kai Chou
Ch.9, p.225 · Ch.9, p.224
Influence · Robert Cialdini
Ch.4, p.107
Opower: evaluating the impact of home energy reports on energy conservation in the United States · J-PAL summary of Allcott (2011, J. Public Economics) and Allcott & Rogers (2014, AER), 2014
Case grade A. From a regulator, a public filing or a peer-reviewed study.Evidence grade A. Robust evidence: replicated, peer-reviewed research.
Source IDs: CASE-M31GT#58INF-T-SP-17
Book content is paraphrased, never quoted at length. Last verified October 24, 2026.
Your product
Find the stage your product is stuck in
Your product has its own version of this story. Find the stage it’s in and the move that fits it. Connecting is free; a Pro subscription starts it.